On Wednesday we acquired that a rural county in Nevada was beginning the process of hand-counting all of the mail-in ballots that experienced been received for the midterm elections so considerably. It was a contentious course of action, with Democrats and liberal activist groups furiously submitting lawsuits to try to stop the depend from having position in progress of the equipment voting that will occur on election working day. That system paid off for them due to the fact a ruling from the point out supreme courtroom led to the count being halted yet again, though the media descriptions of the ruling make it fewer than distinct that the court docket would terminate the depend totally. For case in point, this report from the Related Push statements that the courtroom uncovered the hand count to be “illegal.” But that seems to be a disingenuous description at finest.
An unparalleled hand-count of mail-in ballots in a rural Nevada county is on maintain and could not resume right after the Nevada Supreme Courtroom mentioned in an immediately after-several hours ruling the latest process is unlawful and the Republican secretary of point out directed the county clerk to “cease instantly.”
Volunteers in rural Nye County had wrapped up a second day of hand-counting the ballots on Thursday by the time the Supreme Court issued a three-website page viewpoint siding with objections raised by the American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada.
Secretary of Point out Barbara Cegavske, who is in cost of elections and has been been 1 of the GOP’s most vocal critics of the kind of voter-fraud conspiracy theories that fueled the hand tallying of ballots, mentioned the “hand-counting method ought to stop right away.”
Reading through additional into the particulars of the court’s ruling in favor of the ACLU of Nevada, it is not mentioned that the act of counting the ballots is “illegal.” What they genuinely reported was that at the very least just one part of the method that was settled on as to how the ballots would be counted violated the principles that the courts experienced formerly set up. If that part of the method is corrected, there would seem to be practically nothing stopping the county from resuming the count.
The AP report sooner or later admits that the court’s get “stopped quick of ordering a halt to the recount.” But they did concur with an unexpected emergency order submitted by the ACLU. At issue was a part of the first court buy that the count is accomplished in this kind of a way that “prevents general public launch of early final results in advance of polls shut to in-individual voting Nov. 8.” Observers from a variety of teams were being in the 6 rooms where by the ballots ended up remaining counted and examine aloud and 1 of them – from the ACLU – appeared to be using notes of the outcomes as they had been read through. This was interpreted as a doable way for the totals counted in that space to make it into the general public. So in essence, the ACLU tainted the system as a way to get the depend shut down.
Simply because we now are living in Bizzaro Environment, the ACLU spokesman reported, “Today is a victory for all who think in democracy.” Evidently, making sure an precise rely of all the ballots that are forged is now someway a risk to democracy on the left.
What continues to be unexplained in this total debacle is why the ACLU and the Nevada Democrats are so virulently opposed to possessing any person count the actual physical ballots. What possible determination could anybody have to avoid the entire tally of votes from becoming as opposed to the machine-voting success? (Unless, of study course, you have some motive to suspect that the totals would not match.)
I suppose I can fully grasp why election officials would not want the mail-in vote totals to be unveiled to the community early. If the vote is way too lopsided in possibly way, it may well discourage turnout on election working day. But knowing the mail-in ballot totals is not the very same a “publishing the election results” mainly because you even now would not know who won until eventually all of the in-person votes are counted. This overall argument just seems silly at this position.