Stephanopoulos vs. Paul on 2020: You Think Republicans Are All Liars And That You Are Suitable And We Are Incorrect | Online video

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS, ABC Information Chief ANCHOR: Senator Paul, permit me begin with a threshold issue for you. This election was not stolen, do you settle for that point?

SENATOR RAND PAUL, (R-KY): Effectively, what I would say is that the discussion above whether or not or not there was fraud need to take place, we hardly ever experienced any presentation in courtroom where by we in fact looked at the evidence. Most of the conditions have been thrown out for deficiency of standing, which is a procedural way of not in fact listening to the concern.

There had been numerous states in which the legislation was altered by the Secretary of State and not the point out legislature. To me, these are clearly unconstitutional, and I assume there is however a probability that all those in fact do lastly perform their way up to the Supreme Courtroom.

Courts usually and traditionally never like to listen to election queries. But yes. Were being there men and women who voted twice? Ended up there lifeless persons who voted? Had been there illegal aliens who voted? Of course, and we ought to get to the bottom of it.

I’ll give you an instance. In my condition, when we had a Democrat Secretary of Point out, she refused, even underneath federal get, to purge the roles of illegal voters. We received a Republican Secretary of Point out and he purged the rules.

STEPHANOPOULOS: But Senator Paul, I have to —

PAUL: — variance and those people matters do have to —

STEPHANOPOULOS: I have to end you there. No election is perfect. But there were being 86 worries filed by President Trump and his allies in courtroom, all have been dismissed. Each individual point out licensed the results —

PAUL: Chris, not for —

STEPHANOPOULOS: — just after an investigation —

PAUL: Not for — but —

STEPHANOPOULOS: — depend (ph), soon after investigations —

PAUL: — of evidence. They were dismissed —

STEPHANOPOULOS: — counts and recounts.

PAUL: — for (inaudible).

STEPHANOPOULOS: The Department of Justice led by William Barr mentioned you will find no widespread evidence of fraud. Cannot you just say the text, this election —

PAUL: No.

STEPHANOPOULOS: — was not stolen?

PAUL: Perfectly, what I would counsel is — what I would recommend is that if we want greater self confidence in our elections, and 75 % of Republicans concur with me, is that we do will need to look at election integrity, and we need to have to see if we can restore self-assurance in the elections.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Very well, 75 percent of Republicans agree with you because they had been fed a large lie by President Trump and his supporters to say the election was stolen. Why are not able to you say —

PAUL: Perfectly, I feel —

STEPHANOPOULOS: — President Biden won a legitimate, fair election —

PAUL: — I imagine the place you make a error in — hey, George. George. George, wherever you make a miscalculation is that people coming from the liberal side like you, you instantly say everything’s a lie as an alternative of indicating there are two sides to everything.

Traditionally what would materialize is if claimed that I thought that there was fraud, you would job interview somebody else who said there was not. But now you insert yourself in the middle and say that the complete —

STEPHANOPOULOS: Very well —

PAUL: — fact is that all the things that I’m saying is a lie.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Nicely, because —

PAUL: (Inaudible) point —

STEPHANOPOULOS: — Senator, I said what the president explained was a lie since —

PAUL: — we’re going to.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Keep on a next. He mentioned the election was stolen. This election was not stolen. The success were licensed in just about every one condition —

PAUL: You are expressing —

STEPHANOPOULOS: — right after counts (ph) and recounts.

PAUL: — there was — you’re expressing — you’re indicating that certainly it was — you are saying there was no fraud and it’s all been investigated and which is just not legitimate.

STEPHANOPOULOS: That’s not what I explained, sir.

STEPHANOPOULOS: I mentioned the Office of Justice located no proof —

PAUL: (Inaudible) —

STEPHANOPOULOS: Enable me finish my place.

PAUL: But you say it’s all lies —

STEPHANOPOULOS: You reported some thing that was not correct.

PAUL: You say we’re all liars. You just just say we’re all liars and that you’re suitable and we’re incorrect.

Very well, let — no. Let’s speak about the details of it.

In Wisconsin, tens of thousands of absentee votes experienced only the identify on them and no tackle. Historically people have been thrown out, this time they were not. They designed particular accommodations due to the fact they stated, oh, it’s a pandemic and individuals forgot what their tackle was.

So they adjusted the law following the truth. That is completely wrong, which is unconstitutional. And I strategy on spending the future two yrs likely around point out to point out and repairing these complications and I will not be cowed by liberals in the media who say, there is certainly no proof listed here and you’re a liar if you converse about election fraud.

No, let us have an open up debate. It’s a free of charge country.

STEPHANOPOULOS: There is no widespread proof of election fraud that overturned that results. That was said as very well by the Office of Justice led by President Trump’s legal professional general.

In Wisconsin, there ended up counts and recounts —

PAUL: It was under no circumstances researched. Even that is not real. Even which is not true. Even which is not real.

STEPHANOPOULOS: William Barr mentioned that straight.

PAUL: Barr reported that, but there was — of course, he reported that, yes. That was a pronouncement.

You will find been no examination, comprehensive assessment of all the states to see what issues we experienced and see if they could fix them.

Now, allow me say to be distinct, I voted to certify the state electors because I believe it would be wrong for Congress to overturn that.

But at the very same time, I’m not ready just to sit below and say, oh, all people on the Republican facet is a liar and there is no fraud. No, there have been plenty of difficulties and there ended up secretaries of condition who illegally improved the legislation and that requirements to be preset.

And I’m heading to do the job tricky to take care of it. And I will not be cowed by people declaring, oh, you a
re a liar.

That’s the trouble with the media currently is they say all Republicans are liars, and all the things we say is a lie. There are two sides to every tale. Job interview anyone on the other facet, but really do not insert on your own into the story to say we’re all liars, because we do consider (ph) there’s some fraud and the election needs to be fixed.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Sir, there are not — there are not two sides to this tale. This has been seemed in every one condition.

PAUL: Guaranteed there are. There are two sides to each and every tale. George, you happen to be forgetting who you are. You’re forgetting who you are as a journalist if you believe there’s only just one aspect.

You might be inserting you into the tale to say I’m a liar because I want to seem at election fraud and I want to seem at secretaries of point out who illegally modified the voter guidelines with out the permission of their state legislatures. That is incontrovertible, it transpired.

And you won’t be able to just sweep it beneath the rug and say, oh, very little to see right here, and most people is a liar and you are a idiot if you convey this up. You are inserting by yourself into the tale. A journalist would listen to each sides and there are two sides of a tale.

STEPHANOPOULOS: I’m standing — I’m standing by points. There are not two sides to info. I did not say this was a ideal election. I say the results ended up certified. I said it was not stolen. It is a lie —

PAUL: You are expressing people today are liars. You might be stating individuals are liars if they won’t investigate what took place in the election.

STEPHANOPOULOS: That’s not what I explained.

PAUL: Really should we examine the simple fact that tens of countless numbers of absentee ballots did not have addresses on them and generally have been disqualified, but this time, they have been counted? Should really we look at that?

I never know no matter if it affected the election or not, but I have an open thoughts. And if we experienced in fact take a look at this and we discover out it did not, which is good. But it however really should be mounted.

STEPHANOPOULOS: There can be more investigations. The investigations that have taken spot have revealed there’s not ample fraud to change the results of this election. That has been licensed by each and every state. It was said by the Justice Division and the legal professional typical.

PAUL: And I acknowledged the states’ certifications. But it would not signify that I think there wasn’t fraud and that there weren’t challenges that have to be investigated. And it doesn’t imply that the legislation wasn’t damaged.

I imagine in Pennsylvania, they broke the law, and I think if that at any time will get a true hearing in the Supreme Court docket, it was denied for standing. It was not actually taken up. If it ended up taken up, I do consider that the Supreme Courtroom would overrule and say that they did split the law illegally.

STEPHANOPOULOS: I asked you a really simple concern, was the election stolen or not?

PAUL: I consider there was great deal of proof of fraud and switching of the election laws illegally. And I believe a extensive investigation is warranted.