August 13, 2022


Legal With Effect

Singaporean tough homosexual sex law praises judges grappling with ‘delicate authorized situation’

a group of people posing for the camera: Johnson Ong with lawyers Eugene Thuraisingam, Suang Wijaya, Joel Wong, and Johannes Hadi at Monday’s hearing. Photo: Johnson Ong/Facebook

Johnson Ong with attorneys Eugene Thuraisingam, Suang Wijaya, Joel Wong, and Johannes Hadi at Monday’s listening to. Photo: Johnson Ong/Facebook

A person of the a few Singaporeans difficult the homosexual sexual intercourse law yesterday praised the five attraction courtroom judges who read their arguments for having them very seriously.

Area DJ Johnson Ong, 44, who was represented by significant-profile legal professional Eugene Thuraisingam, praised the judges for asking difficult questions and earning positive everyone’s voice was heard although reflecting on the listening to that took location. 

“There were being times of spirited exchanges among the justices and counsels, which includes with counsel from [Attorney-General’s Chambers],” Ong wrote afterward. 

Ong and two others ended up captivating the substantial court’s 2020 selection to uphold Section 377A of the Penal Code, commonly recognized as the homosexual sexual intercourse legislation, which bans “acts of gross indecency” involving guys. 

He felt they obtained a honest listening to.

“What struck me about right now was the robustness of our judicial program, the higher standard of legal discourse and I felt the genuineness of our justices actually grappling with a incredibly sensitive authorized situation, that is 377A, and definitely hoping to see matters (and some difficult questioning) from the level of see of all the events included,” he added.

The hearing was presided by Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon and appeals court judges Andrew Phang, Judith Prakash, Steven Chong and Tay Yong Kwang. A day for their ruling has yet to be introduced. 

Among the the arguments produced in court was that S377A particularly used to homosexual men, all of whom were being at threat of prosecution even while the regulation has not been systemically enforced. These uncovered responsible of violating it can be jailed for up to two a long time. 

The other two appellants were being retired medical professional Roy Tan, who was represented by M Ravi and Gabriel Rafferty of Carson Law Chambers, and Bryan Choong, the previous main of an LGBT nonprofit advocacy team. He was represented by Harpreet Nehal Singh SC from Audent Chambers. 

Yesterday’s hearings began at 10am and lasted quite a few hrs. The judges will difficulty their ruling at a afterwards day. 

“I know lots of of you are quite anxious as to the end result. The hearing is now concluded and the court of appeal has reserved judgment. That usually means the court can just take a handful of months to a number of months to concern a selection,” Ong claimed. 

This post, Singaporean hard gay intercourse regulation praises judges grappling with ‘delicate lawful situation’, at first appeared on Coconuts, Asia’s foremost alternate media enterprise.