“The essence is that he illegally obtained a economic benefit from his steps as a trustee,” reported Mary Hernandez, standard counsel to the Napa school district. The violations provided currently being paid from funds provided to NVUSD as effectively as voting on that funding, and Hagedorn had been warned by the district’s legal counsel about doable conflicts of curiosity, Hernandez informed board members at district headquarters in Napa.
Although the FPPC did not great Hagedorn and reported other allegations against him tumble outdoors the state’s five-calendar year statute of restrictions, its warning detect will stay on file, is viewable on the agency internet site and can be thought of in any long term enforcement steps, wrote Angela J. Brereton, main of the condition agency’s enforcement division.
The state commission chose not to great Hagedorn since payments produced to Legacy did not right gain him, and due to the fact he had no preceding background of violations and no lengthier serves on the Napa college board, Brereton included.
The state letter does not point out any allegations of misusing police funding, but Hernandez on Thursday claimed NVUSD has alleged more than a dozen violations by Hagedorn, some of which could have activated point out fines.
Hagedorn could have contested the selection by requesting a probable-induce hearing inside of 10 days of the ruling, but the point out, in that scenario, could have pulled its warning and as a substitute sought to prosecute him, Brereton reported in the warning recognize.