A new immigration law could impose exit bans on Hong Kongers

a man standing in front of a building

© Furnished by Quartz

In the months due to the fact a repressive nationwide security legislation upended lifetime in Hong Kong, various activists and politicians have fled the town for self-imposed exile overseas. Several more have emigrated, and as Britain’s new citizenship pathway for Hong Kongers will take effect at the conclude of this month, hundreds of 1000’s more could leave in the coming a long time.

Just currently, local media documented that jailed activist Joshua Wong’s parents and brother have left the town for Australia.

But there are fears that Chinese authorities could try to make it more challenging for Hong Kongers to escape the crackdown, for case in point by adopting mainland Chinese-fashion exit bans particularly in opposition to activists and dissidents. For months, Beijing has built noises that the Uk present to Hong Kongers infringes its sovereign legal rights more than its citizens.


Already, some of the in excess of 10,000 people today who have been arrested considering the fact that protests started off in June 2019 have had to surrender their vacation paperwork. Those people who beforehand would have resorted to fleeing for Taiwan by boat may possibly now very seriously reconsider that escape possibility, immediately after 12 Hong Kong activists who did so ended up intercepted by mainland Chinese authorities, with 10 of them just sentenced to up to 3 a long time in prison by a Shenzhen courtroom. And following the dramatic escape very last thirty day period of a previous lawmaker, who managed to retrieve his confiscated passport by presenting an official invitation from a Danish politician, bail problems are specified to get more durable for arrests likely ahead.

Of certain worry is the actuality that the new nationwide protection legislation grants police new powers to confiscate travel documents, explained community legal professionals. Beforehand, merely being arrested did not warrant surrendering these documents those people arrested experienced to be brought in advance of a decide, who would then grant bail on certain problems that could involve the confiscation of travel documents. Less than the new stability laws, however, law enforcement are entitled to confiscate the journey documents of anybody suspected of endangering national stability. For example, the dozens of activists arrested this thirty day period under the safety legislation were purchased to surrender their passports, even even though they were later on launched without the need of cost.

Nonetheless, there are cases in which all those arrested under the protection laws afterwards have their passports returned. Yesterday, a few teenage activists who ended up arrested previous July on suspicion of subversion and secession were produced unconditionally and had retrieved their journey files. On Twitter, Hong Kong activists responded to the information by urging the teenagers to flee the metropolis as soon as probable.

Towards this backdrop, the Hong Kong government has proposed amendments to the city’s immigration legal guidelines. Ostensibly, authorities say the updates are essential for streamlining the processing of asylum seekers’ non-refoulement statements, applications to prevent a human being from remaining despatched to a different country in which their fundamental rights are at risk of currently being violated.

But authorized professionals have pointed out many issues with the invoice, which is in committee and must undertake a remaining spherical of studying right before it’s voted on in a legislature that no longer has an opposition. Initially, a human rights attorney argues the actions perhaps damage asylum seekers with an excessively bureaucratic method, and violate Hong Kong’s monthly bill of legal rights. And second, critics say the amendments could be interpreted so widely as to impose de facto exit bans on anyone.

Exit bans are ordinarily more related with China’s opaque authorized procedure than Hong Kong’s popular regulation method, in which due procedure, transparency, and impartial courts and judges have very long been embedded in the city’s DNA. Though China calm its entry and exit controls as component of its economic reforms starting in the late 1970s, authorities nonetheless regularly slap exit bans on activists and liberal intellectuals, even if they are not remaining prosecuted for a crime. Study by Thomas Kellogg and Zhao Sile of Georgetown University’s Center for Asian Law uncovered at the very least 149 circumstances of exit bans currently being utilized on Chinese citizens in excess of the previous 15 many years.

Just one of the changes (pdf) to immigration regulation proposed by the Hong Kong govt that has prompted the most alarm is a provision
that would empower the government’s immigration director, with no acquiring a court buy, to bar any particular person from boarding a plane or ship.

While the govt has explained the actions tackle asylum-connected scenarios, “there is nothing that says it will only be applied to asylum seekers, or at the really the very least, non-Hong Kong residents,” mentioned Hong Kong-centered barrister Senia Ng. “Thus, with the incredibly basic and huge wording, it could have a genuine likelihood of ensuing in exit bans on anyone—including Hong Kong people today, political dissidents.”

Another provision would authorize the immigration director to desire carriers supply authorities with in-depth information and facts about its passengers and crew.

In impact, this could pose “a serious probability of imposing obstacles on individuals trying to find to flee political persecution in Hong Kong,” mentioned Ng, mainly because the authorities could “mandate the carriers to notify the federal government first ahead of they board the carrier or even to end them from leaving.” In truth, Ng additional, the government could desire data not just on men and women, but an overall course of persons, this sort of as British Nationwide Overseas passport holders. The BNO passport is a doc issued to Hong Kong inhabitants born ahead of the 1997 handover, and it is holders of these documents who are the aim of the British isles citizenship provide.

The government has cited the need to have to extra proficiently distinct a backlog (pdf) of non-refoulement statements as a vital reason for putting forward the proposed amendments, and to “ensure before removing of unsuccessful claimants.” Even so, the selection of pending statements has by now reduced from above 10,000 in 2015 to just in excess of 300 very last 12 months, in accordance to government figures.

Moreover, if the government’s most important intention with the alterations is to clear away unsuccessful claimants as before long as attainable, “it’s a bit unconventional for the authorities to limit an asylum seeker from leaving the territory,” mentioned Ng.

Go on Reading